When does a biased graph come from a group labelling?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
When does a biased graph come from a group labelling?
A biased graph consists of a graph G together with a collection of distinguished cycles of G, called balanced, with the property that no theta subgraph contains exactly two balanced cycles. Perhaps the most natural biased graphs on G arise from orienting G and then labelling the edges of G with elements of a group Γ. In this case, we may define a biased graph by declaring a cycle to be balanced...
متن کاملWhen does the complement of the annihilating-ideal graph of a commutative ring admit a cut vertex?
The rings considered in this article are commutative with identity which admit at least two nonzero annihilating ideals. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $mathbb{A}(R)$ denote the set of all annihilating ideals of $R$ and let $mathbb{A}(R)^{*} = mathbb{A}(R)backslash {(0)}$. The annihilating-ideal graph of $R$, denoted by $mathbb{AG}(R)$ is an undirected simple graph whose vertex set is $mathbb{A}(R...
متن کاملA note on the order graph of a group
The order graph of a group $G$, denoted by $Gamma^*(G)$, is a graph whose vertices are subgroups of $G$ and two distinct vertices $H$ and $K$ are adjacent if and only if $|H|big{|}|K|$ or $|K|big{|}|H|$. In this paper, we study the connectivity and diameter of this graph. Also we give a relation between the order graph and prime graph of a group.
متن کاملwhen does the complement of the annihilating-ideal graph of a commutative ring admit a cut vertex?
the rings considered in this article are commutative with identity which admit at least two nonzero annihilating ideals. let $r$ be a ring. let $mathbb{a}(r)$ denote the set of all annihilating ideals of $r$ and let $mathbb{a}(r)^{*} = mathbb{a}(r)backslash {(0)}$. the annihilating-ideal graph of $r$, denoted by $mathbb{ag}(r)$ is an undirected simple graph whose vertex set is $mathbb{a}(r)...
متن کاملWhere Does Compositionality Come From?
This paper builds on the insight of Lashley (1951) and Miller, Galanter, & Pribram (1960) that action and motor planning mechanisms provide a basis for all serially ordered compositional systems, including language and reasoning. It reinterprets this observation in terms of modern AI formalisms for planning, showing that both the syntactic apparatus that projects lexical meanings onto sentences...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Advances in Applied Mathematics
سال: 2014
ISSN: 0196-8858
DOI: 10.1016/j.aam.2014.08.002